Re: Exar Kun vs Darth Tenebrous

December 16th 2019, 11:52 am

LadyKulvax wrote:His Force feats are laughably more impressive, also Tenebrous has pretty much nothing in terms of lightsaber feats that can compare to Kun taking on Ulic and then his defeat of Vodo much later. That someone like Ventress is using his techniques to complete his repertoire is very telling.

Tenebrous has the benefit of Banite scaling that puts him > Kun

December 16th 2019, 11:53 am

Exar Kun is like your average ISIS/Daesh terrorist: sounds scary, but in reality is an ineffectual b*tch most of the time.

December 16th 2019, 12:03 pm

No, it doesn't. Kun has his own scaling chains too, you realise?

I could go around making Thon >>> Bane & Zannah arguments if you'd like.

December 16th 2019, 12:03 pm

EmperorCaedus wrote:

LadyKulvax wrote:His Force feats are laughably more impressive, also Tenebrous has pretty much nothing in terms of lightsaber feats that can compare to Kun taking on Ulic and then his defeat of Vodo much later. That someone like Ventress is using his techniques to complete his repertoire is very telling.

Tenebrous has the benefit of Banite scaling that puts him > Kun

What about Banite scaling puts him above Kun?

December 16th 2019, 12:04 pm

BreakofDawn wrote:
Exar Kun is like your average ISIS/Daesh terrorist: sounds scary, but in reality is an ineffectual b*tch most of the time.

I'd like to see you prove that, but we both know you never will.

December 16th 2019, 12:07 pm

LadyKulvax wrote:

BreakofDawn wrote:
Exar Kun is like your average ISIS/Daesh terrorist: sounds scary, but in reality is an ineffectual b*tch most of the time.

I'd like to see you prove that, but we both know you never will.

Well, a terrorist tries to be intimidating, much like Kun.

A terrorist also has a handful of bullsh*t accolades, much like Kun.

The terrorist then dies like a little b*tch, much like Kun.

December 16th 2019, 12:28 pm

I mean nice troll, I guess. But I'm seeing nothing of substance here.

December 16th 2019, 12:33 pm

Tenebrous scales vastly above popping the GALAXY!LIGHT!BUBBLE. Kun is nowhere close to galaxy level, so Tenebrous one-shots.

December 16th 2019, 12:39 pm

Genuinely cancerous speculation. Does anyone have something that isn't entirely based on the theories of characters in the novel?

December 16th 2019, 12:48 pm

Tenebrous was comparable to Plagueis, who in turn is comparable to post-boost Sheev and even ROTS Sidious, who at that point is considered the most powerful Sith in history.

Sidious > Plagueis > Tenebrous > SWTOR Vitiate > solar system buster Kun.

Exar Kun vs Darth Tenebrous - Page 2 3750555731

Exar Kun vs Darth Tenebrous - Page 2 3750555731

December 16th 2019, 12:55 pm

LadyKulvax wrote:Genuinely cancerous speculation. Does anyone have something that isn't entirely based on the theories of characters in the novel?

Genuinely cancerous rebuttal. Does anyone have something that isn't entirely based on kriff argumentation?

December 16th 2019, 1:41 pm

Tenebrous > Darth Maul (TPM) >> Darth Maul w/ one saber >> SF Malak >> Exar Kun

December 16th 2019, 1:42 pm

The nerf herder Maul quote aside, what puts Tenebrous>Maul?

December 16th 2019, 1:44 pm

KingofBlades wrote:The nerf herder Maul quote aside, what puts Tenebrous>Maul?

Tenebrous's masters feats, and scaling above that himself. Also Plagueis accolades on Tenebrous put him above "The Assassin."

December 16th 2019, 1:48 pm

Nothing you just said conclusively puts Maul below Tenebrous. Intuitively speaking you could be correct, but if we wanna use intuition Sadow>Tenebrous's master. Which would logically put Kun at or above Tenebrous.

December 16th 2019, 1:50 pm

KingofBlades wrote:Nothing you just said conclusively puts Maul below Tenebrous. Intuitively speaking you could be correct, but if we wanna use intuition Sadow>Tenebrous's master. Which would logically put Kun at or above Tenebrous.

Why is Sadow > Tenebrous's master?

December 16th 2019, 2:14 pm

If one accepted the tales handed down in accounts and
holocrons, the ancient Sith had known how to accomplish
this. But had Sith like Naga Sadow and Exar Kun genuinely
been more powerful, or had they benefited from the fact that
the dark side had been more prominent in those bygone
eras? Some commentators claimed that the ability to
survive death had been limited to those with a talent for
sorcery and alchemy, and that the use of such practices
actually predated the arrival of the Dark Jedi exiles on Korriban. But sorcery had been employed less to extend
life than to create illusions, fashion beasts, and resurrect
the dead. Powerful adepts were said to have been able to
saturate the atmosphere of planets with dark side energy,compel stars to explode, or induce paralysis in crowds, as Exar Kun apparently did to select members of the Republic Senate.

So we have Plagueis contemplating the feats of the ancient sith like Exar Kun and Naga Sadow. In order to rationalize the grandeur of these feats he posits that the dark side may have been more powerful back then. The need to rationalize these feats implies that none of the banite sith preceding him ,including Tenebrous, were powerful enough to replicate these feats. Now one might say that one must have the gift for sorcery so this wouldn't be proof of the ancients's superiority over Tenebrous, who did not possess the gift of sorcery. However if this were true and Plagueis thought that Tenebrous was indeed more powerful than the ancients, his theory that the dark side was more powerful back then would not have been needed. So it's very likely that Plagueis believes the ancients were above all of the banite line preceding him.

December 16th 2019, 3:01 pm

or, u know, plagueis never even saw how strong tenebrous actually was in the first place, just like he never saw how strong naga or kun were either, making this pretty damn useless. but hey, it is what it is

December 17th 2019, 9:09 am

Pre-Cinnagar Kun pulling off the same TK feat as Dooku, with similar ease, probably puts him above Tenebrous even as of that point. Kek.

December 17th 2019, 9:15 am

December 17th 2019, 9:29 am

I hope you don't expect realistic replies to a thread with people claiming Bane > Kun, lmao. This thread can burn and die.

December 20th 2019, 3:01 pm

BreakofDawn wrote:Tenebrous was comparable to Plagueis, who in turn is comparable to post-boost Sheev and even ROTS Sidious, who at that point is considered the most powerful Sith in history.

Sidious > Plagueis > Tenebrous > SWTOR Vitiate > solar system buster Kun.

Tenebrous was comparable to Plagueis to a certain degree, sure. He got surpassed after his death. And no Plagueis is not comparable to post-boost Sheev or anywhere near ROTS Sheev. ROTS Sheev has not got a single Legends OOU Historical quote to his name, as much as others would like to act as if he has a mountain.

Worse yet, Chee doesn't take any supremacy quotes as canonically binding. So no one else is obligated to either.

Oh and literally no one called Kun solar system busting.

You can stop now and just accept the L or I can conjure genuine feats comparisons and straight up end this whole thread. Your choice.

December 20th 2019, 3:01 pm

(I got bored and decided to stir kriff up.)

December 20th 2019, 3:03 pm

kulvax is technically right here. BUT tenebrous' slight parity with plagueis, who is somewhat implied to be have been the strongest sith after vitiate does put him in the lvls strong enough to match said vitiate, making him reliably stronger than kun imo

December 20th 2019, 3:05 pm

Azronger wrote:Not even convinced Kun passes Bane

No, of course you wouldn't.

But given that DoE Bane couldn't even handle the residual energy of Ambria when channelled, whereas Thon managed to contain the entire planetary nexus and all of the Sith spirits all across the planet simultaneously and trap it there, even after death.

Yes, I'm not convinced Thon doesn't slap his bald head into next week.