KOTOR 2 writer criticised Last Jedi

Azronger wrote:Avellone is based. His opinions on versus matches suck, though.

Azronger wrote:Avellone is based. His opinions on versus matches suck, though.

Trayus Marauder wrote:

Azronger wrote:Avellone is based. His opinions on versus matches suck, though.

Not disagreeing but do you have specific examples to highlight how his opinions on matchups suck?

Azronger wrote:

Trayus Marauder wrote:

Azronger wrote:Avellone is based. His opinions on versus matches suck, though.

Not disagreeing but do you have specific examples to highlight how his opinions on matchups suck?

He said Revan >>> Vader > Nihilus. He generally seems to disrespect Nihilus a lot and says a bunch of dumb shit to lower the character from where the actual source material portrays him to be.

Flunky Cyborg wrote:Sigh. 

It's an unpopular opinion to say this and i risk crucifixion for doing so but... okay tlj luke is out of character yeah, but It's still better than the goody two shoes Grandmaster Luke who oneshots everyone low diff. The best option would be DE Luke, he's still powerful. He's still cool, but he's also still very much a boy, he's still relatable, personally GM Luke was a hardass and an overpowered zealot imo, It's more fitting for luke to walk the line of conflict and not be stupidly overpowered. It's better for luke to be conflicted then doing some Revan bullshit where he "weilds the light and darkness in perfect balance" and achieves oneness or some other overpowered bullshit. I like my Star wars to be black and white for the most part. Good guys and bad guys. The way to do conflict is how they did Traya, but the whole Revan approach is just too silly. There is no possible way someone can be half sith and half Jedi, you cannot value the pursuit of power above all else and still be in control of the situation and take down only the bad guys. It's like that tv show Dexter, for as good of the entertainment as it is there is no way in hell someone with urges like that could be a good guy or only kill "the bad guys" he would not be able to control or rationalize those thoughts. Same thing with Revan and luke, It's feasibly impossible to be a power hungry maniac and a guy fighting for his family. The light and the dark are polar opposites which is why I don't like the eu approach to luke, controlling your passion is one thing, but to be able to walk that fine line and not be mentally ill is too unrealistic for me.

Flunky Cyborg wrote:Sigh. 

It's an unpopular opinion to say this and i risk crucifixion for doing so but... okay tlj luke is out of character yeah, but It's still better than the goody two shoes Grandmaster Luke who oneshots everyone low diff. The best option would be DE Luke, he's still powerful. He's still cool, but he's also still very much a boy, he's still relatable, personally GM Luke was a hardass and an overpowered zealot imo, It's more fitting for luke to walk the line of conflict and not be stupidly overpowered. It's better for luke to be conflicted then doing some Revan bullshit where he "weilds the light and darkness in perfect balance" and achieves oneness or some other overpowered bullshit. I like my Star wars to be black and white for the most part. Good guys and bad guys. The way to do conflict is how they did Traya, but the whole Revan approach is just too silly. There is no possible way someone can be half sith and half Jedi, you cannot value the pursuit of power above all else and still be in control of the situation and take down only the bad guys. It's like that tv show Dexter, for as good of the entertainment as it is there is no way in hell someone with urges like that could be a good guy or only kill "the bad guys" he would not be able to control or rationalize those thoughts. Same thing with Revan and luke, It's feasibly impossible to be a power hungry maniac and a guy fighting for his family. The light and the dark are polar opposites which is why I don't like the eu approach to luke, controlling your passion is one thing, but to be able to walk that fine line and not be mentally ill is too unrealistic for me.